In a Fraunhofer diffraction experiment at a single slit using a light of wavelength 400nm, the first minimum is formed at an angle of \[{30^ \circ }\]. The direction $\theta $ of the first secondary maximum is given by:
a. ${\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{2}{3}} \right)$
b. ${\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right)$
c. ${\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{1}{4}} \right)$
d. $ta{n^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{2}{3}} \right)$
Answer
610.2k+ views
Hint: From the path difference relation for minima try to find the slit width. Use that to find the direction for secondary maximum.
Formula Used:
For minima of a diffraction:
$a\sin {\theta _{\min }} = n\lambda $ -----(1)
Where,
a is width of the slit,
n is order of the minima,
${\theta _{\min }}$ is angle for ${n^{th}}$ minima formation,
$\lambda $ is the wavelength of the light.
For maxima of a diffraction:
$a\sin {\theta _{\max }} = \left( {n + \dfrac{1}{2}} \right)\lambda $ ------(2)
${\theta _{\max }}$ is angle for ${n^{th}}$maxima formation.
Complete answer:
Given:
Wavelength of the light used, $\lambda = 400nm$.
For n=1 i.e. for first minima ${\theta _{\min }} = {30^ \circ }$.
To find: direction angle for first secondary maxima.
> Step 1
Substitute the value of n, $\lambda $and ${\theta _{\min }}$in eq(1) to get a:
$
asin\left( {{{30}^ \circ }} \right) = 1 \times 400 \\
\Rightarrow a \times \dfrac{1}{2} = 400 \\
\Rightarrow a = 400 \times 2 = 800nm \\
$
> Step 2
For first secondary maxima, $n = 1$.
Now, use the value of a in eq(2) to get ${\theta _{\max }}$:
$
800 \times sin{\theta _{\max }} = \left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{2}} \right) \times 400 \\
\Rightarrow sin{\theta _{\max }} = \dfrac{3}{2} \times \dfrac{{400}}{{800}} \\
\Rightarrow {\theta _{\max }} = {\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right) \\
$
Hence, the direction $\theta $ of the first secondary maximum is given by ${\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right)$.
Note: This problem can be solved without using the value of $\lambda$ and without finding the value of a. Just take the ratio of eq(1) and eq(2) after inserting proper values of n and ${\theta _{\min }}$. You’ll see:
$
\dfrac{{a\sin {\theta _{\max }}}}{{a\sin ({{30}^ \circ })}} = \dfrac{{\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{2}} \right)\lambda }}{{1 \times \lambda }} \\
\Rightarrow \sin {\theta _{\max }} = \dfrac{3}{2} \times \dfrac{1}{2} \\
\Rightarrow {\theta _{\max }} = {\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right) \\
$
And this is the same answer you got previously but this time with a lot less amount of calculations.
Also, many students get confused with the term ‘first secondary maxima’. Always remember that the first secondary maxima is the first maxima beside the central one, not the central one itself. So, for this maxima the value of n will be 1 not 0.
Formula Used:
For minima of a diffraction:
$a\sin {\theta _{\min }} = n\lambda $ -----(1)
Where,
a is width of the slit,
n is order of the minima,
${\theta _{\min }}$ is angle for ${n^{th}}$ minima formation,
$\lambda $ is the wavelength of the light.
For maxima of a diffraction:
$a\sin {\theta _{\max }} = \left( {n + \dfrac{1}{2}} \right)\lambda $ ------(2)
${\theta _{\max }}$ is angle for ${n^{th}}$maxima formation.
Complete answer:
Given:
Wavelength of the light used, $\lambda = 400nm$.
For n=1 i.e. for first minima ${\theta _{\min }} = {30^ \circ }$.
To find: direction angle for first secondary maxima.
> Step 1
Substitute the value of n, $\lambda $and ${\theta _{\min }}$in eq(1) to get a:
$
asin\left( {{{30}^ \circ }} \right) = 1 \times 400 \\
\Rightarrow a \times \dfrac{1}{2} = 400 \\
\Rightarrow a = 400 \times 2 = 800nm \\
$
> Step 2
For first secondary maxima, $n = 1$.
Now, use the value of a in eq(2) to get ${\theta _{\max }}$:
$
800 \times sin{\theta _{\max }} = \left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{2}} \right) \times 400 \\
\Rightarrow sin{\theta _{\max }} = \dfrac{3}{2} \times \dfrac{{400}}{{800}} \\
\Rightarrow {\theta _{\max }} = {\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right) \\
$
Hence, the direction $\theta $ of the first secondary maximum is given by ${\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right)$.
Note: This problem can be solved without using the value of $\lambda$ and without finding the value of a. Just take the ratio of eq(1) and eq(2) after inserting proper values of n and ${\theta _{\min }}$. You’ll see:
$
\dfrac{{a\sin {\theta _{\max }}}}{{a\sin ({{30}^ \circ })}} = \dfrac{{\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{2}} \right)\lambda }}{{1 \times \lambda }} \\
\Rightarrow \sin {\theta _{\max }} = \dfrac{3}{2} \times \dfrac{1}{2} \\
\Rightarrow {\theta _{\max }} = {\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right) \\
$
And this is the same answer you got previously but this time with a lot less amount of calculations.
Also, many students get confused with the term ‘first secondary maxima’. Always remember that the first secondary maxima is the first maxima beside the central one, not the central one itself. So, for this maxima the value of n will be 1 not 0.
Recently Updated Pages
Master Class 12 Business Studies: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Chemistry: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Biology: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Class 12 Question and Answer - Your Ultimate Solutions Guide

Master Class 11 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
Which is more stable and why class 12 chemistry CBSE

Which are the Top 10 Largest Countries of the World?

Draw a labelled sketch of the human eye class 12 physics CBSE

Differentiate between homogeneous and heterogeneous class 12 chemistry CBSE

What are the major means of transport Explain each class 12 social science CBSE

Sulphuric acid is known as the king of acids State class 12 chemistry CBSE

