Explain the reasons for the lukewarm response of some Muslim organisations to the Civil Disobedience movement.
Answer
590.1k+ views
Hint: The Civil disobedience movement in India was started on 12th March 1930 after Gabdhiji started that historic salt march from Sabarmati to Dandi to protest against the salt tax of the British. Before this, the only large scale movement seen in India was the Non cooperation and Khilafat movement where both Hindu and Muslim leaders decided to fight for Khilafat and swaraj together.
Complete answer: Muslim organisations were lukewarm in response to the civildisbodience movements, there were many reasons to this:-
a. After the Non cooperation and Khilafat movement came to an end, the muslims of India didn’t feel represented by the Congress.
b. They felt that the Congress was more closely related to the Hindu organisations and favoured their ideas.
c. This led to a mutual distrust between the Hindu and Muslim communities, both the communities organised processions in areas of North India, this led to communal riots.
d. In 1927, the Muslim league and Indian national congress tried to form an alliance.
e. The demands of the Muslim league were assurance of reserved seats in the Central assembly, they were also willing to give up their demad of separate electorates, however all hopes of unity were lost when M.R. Jaykar, a member of the Hindu Mahasabha made a public declaration that no such demands would be entertained.
Note: When the civil disobedience movement started in 1930, the Muslims felt alienated from the congress and thus could not respond to calls for unity. Added to this were the concerns of Muslim leaders over the status of Muslims in India and whether they would have equal rights after India’s freedom, this led to some leaders of the Muslim league, demanding a separate nation for muslims.
Complete answer: Muslim organisations were lukewarm in response to the civildisbodience movements, there were many reasons to this:-
a. After the Non cooperation and Khilafat movement came to an end, the muslims of India didn’t feel represented by the Congress.
b. They felt that the Congress was more closely related to the Hindu organisations and favoured their ideas.
c. This led to a mutual distrust between the Hindu and Muslim communities, both the communities organised processions in areas of North India, this led to communal riots.
d. In 1927, the Muslim league and Indian national congress tried to form an alliance.
e. The demands of the Muslim league were assurance of reserved seats in the Central assembly, they were also willing to give up their demad of separate electorates, however all hopes of unity were lost when M.R. Jaykar, a member of the Hindu Mahasabha made a public declaration that no such demands would be entertained.
Note: When the civil disobedience movement started in 1930, the Muslims felt alienated from the congress and thus could not respond to calls for unity. Added to this were the concerns of Muslim leaders over the status of Muslims in India and whether they would have equal rights after India’s freedom, this led to some leaders of the Muslim league, demanding a separate nation for muslims.
Recently Updated Pages
Master Class 12 Business Studies: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Biology: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Chemistry: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Class 12 Question and Answer - Your Ultimate Solutions Guide

Master Class 11 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
Explain the Treaty of Vienna of 1815 class 10 social science CBSE

Which Indian city is known as the "City of Victory"?

Which instrument is used to measure the Blood Pressure?

Who Won 36 Oscar Awards? Record Holder Revealed

What is the median of the first 10 natural numbers class 10 maths CBSE

Why is it 530 pm in india when it is 1200 afternoon class 10 social science CBSE

