Question

How did the idea of popular sovereignty affect slavery in the United States?

Answer 1

Hint: Popular sovereignty, also called squatter sovereignty, in U.S. history. It is the principle that the authority of a state and its government are created and sustained by the consent of its people, through their elected representatives (rule by the people), who are the source of all political power.

Complete answer:
Popular Sovereignty means that through their elected representatives (the rule of the people) which is the source of every political power, a state and its government are created and sustained by the consent of its people.

The people of the federal territories should decide for their own sakes whether their territories enter the European Union as free or slave states. Their popular sovereignty, or squatter sovereignty, is a contentious political doctrine in American history. Her enemies called it "squatter sovereignty," particularly in New England.

Popular sovereignty -
Popular sovereignty is the principle that a state and its government, by means of their elected representatives (people's rule), which are the source of every political power, shall be established and sustained by their own consent. The company is closely connected with social contract philosophers like Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Locke. Popular sovereignty is a concept, not always a reflector or description of a political reality. Benjamin Franklin expressed this concept when he wrote: "The rulers are the servants in free governments and their superiors and sovereigns in the people."

The idea of popular sovereignty affect slavery in the United States -
The concept of popular sovereignty as it pertains to the extension, during the antebellum, of slavery to territories was a political concept that permitting or prohibiting slavery for the residents of the territories themselves, rather than Congresses.

In all new countries and territories, the concept of popular sovereignty made legal slavery possible.
In 1850, it was first used to organise the territories of Utah and New Mexico. Its crucial application was the adoption of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 by the U.S. Sen. Stephen A. Douglas, which repealed a ban north of 36°30 on latitude (established in the Missouri Compromise of 1820). The violence after which the territory of Kansas was controlled (see Bleeding Kansas) showed the failure of popular sovereignty as a possible basis for agreement between pro-slavery factions in the country.

In the 1850s compromise, if they wanted to become free (slavery not legal) or slave, new territories and states could vote (Slavery legal) Previous laws establishing a north border of illegal slavery have been reversed.
Popular sovereignty made it possible for all the USA to become a legal slavery nation. Slavery provided a legal basis for popular sovereignty.

In the Northern States, popular sovereignty made slavery more odious. Thanks to popular sovereignty, the absolute movement was stronger.

The nation would have to be either fully slave or free after popular sovereignty. Under popular sovereignty the nation division that exists since its foundation cannot survive. This was made clear by Abraham Lincoln in the famous debates in Douglas Lincoln. "A divided nation cannot stand against itself".

Note:
Popular sovereignty means that people are their government's ultimate source of authority. Popular sovereignty means that democratic government is BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE—for the benefit of the people, not for the benefit of those who govern in their name.

The rush both pro- and anti-slavery forces to populate and determine Kansas' fate, manifesting itself in fraud and violence, were one of the main consequences of popular sovereignty.