Question

Compare the popular struggles of Nepal and Bolivia.

Answer 1

Hint: These 2 stories are from very dissimilar backgrounds. The crusade in Nepal was to launch democracy, while the fight in Bolivia convoluted prerogatives on an adopted, democratic government. The prevalent fight in Bolivia was about one precise rule, while the fight in Nepal was about the practicalities of the nation’s politics. Both these fights were fruitful but their influence was at unalike levels.

Complete answer:
Democracy nearly unvaryingly comprises divergence of welfares and opinions. These variances are frequently articulated in methodical ways. Those who are in authority are obligated to poise these contradictory ultimatums and compressions. The prevalent fights of Nepal and Bolivia are conscripted as follows:
Political conflict – The extensive fight was instigated owing to biased political verdicts. In Nepal, the king strived to depose democracy and in Bolivia, the government gave water rights to Multinational Corporations (MNCs).
Mass mobilization – Both the occurrences altered the complete populace and simultaneously, they determined to stand up for their rights. It was the mass mobilization that made those in control to obey.
Political organizations – Both the fights were controlled by political organizations like parties and compression groups that portrayed an enormous part in the armament of people.

Note: It may originally seem that it is not advantageous for groups that endorse the interest of one unit to have a stimulus in democracy. A democracy must look after the welfare of all, not just one unit. Also, it may appear that these groups exercise authority without accountability. Political parties have to face the people in elections, but these groups are not answerable to the people. Compression groups and crusades may not get their capital and backing from the people. Occasionally, compression groups with small public backing but lots of money can take over public debate in favor of their minute plan. On balance, though, compression groups and crusades have expanded democracy. Putting weight on the monarchs is not an unnatural motion in a democracy as long as everyone gets this prospect.