Question

Combined the two simple sentences to form a meaningful compound sentence.
Man proposes. God disposes.
a) Man proposes nor God disposes.
b) Man proposes, but God disposes.
c) Man proposes so that God disposes.
d) Man proposes because God disposes.

Answer 1

Hint: Sentences containing two or more coordinate independent clauses are usually connected by one or more conjunctions, but there are no subordinate clauses, such as lightning flash (independent clause) and (conjunction) rain (independent clause).

Complete answer:
A basic sentence has just one subject and predicate. It has a limited action word with a finished idea. A compound sentence has in any event two sections (likewise alluded to as a proviso). Each part has its own subject and predicate and bodes well without anyone else. Thus every statement is free of the other and called the principle provision or autonomous proviso. The principle conditions are associated with utilizing a co-ordinating combination (for, and, nor, at the same time, or, yet, so). A mind-boggling sentence has at any rate one fundamental condition (which is an autonomous statement) and at least one ward provisos, associated with utilizing a subordinate combination. The needy provision can't remain without anyone else and bode well. It relies upon the principle condition.
Alternative A: "nor" is a negative correlative combination, which is normally matched with "not one or the other". Be that as it may, now and again, it can likewise be utilized with other negative articulations (like "not") and still be linguistically right. Model: "I am not going to the gathering, nor is she". In any case, in the given model, there is no other negative articulation. Subsequently, the use of "nor" freely is syntactically wrong. Subsequently, this choice is wrong.
Choice B: The two conditions viz (I) "Man proposes" and (ii) "God arranges", can stand freely and bode well. They are autonomous provisions associated with utilizing the co-ordinating combination "however". Subsequently, this is a compound sentence and this answer is right.
Choices C and D: "So that" and "in light of the fact that" are subjecting conjunctions used to show circumstances and logical results connections. They interface with autonomous and subordinate provisions and structure an intricate sentence. The provision, "Man proposes" is an autonomous condition. Nonetheless, the statements, "so God arranges" and "on the grounds that God arranges" are reliant conditions. They can't remain all alone and bode well. Further, there are no circumstances and logical results connection between the reliant and free condition. Thus, this alternative is off base.

Note:
This precept is an interpretation from "The Imitation of Christ" by the German-conceived Thomas à Kempis (c.1380-1471): "For the goals of the simply rely preferably upon the beauty of God over on their own shrewdness; and in Him, they generally put their trust, whatever they take close by. For man proposes, yet God arranges; nor is the method of man in his own hands." This might be an impression of a stanza in the Bible (Proverbs 16:9): "A man's heart deviseth his way: yet the Lord directeth his means." Shakespeare, as well, had a comparative message in Hamlet by Hamlet: "There is a holiness that shapes our closures, harsh slash them how we will."