Question

Who is the author of two treatises of government?
A. Jean Jacques Rousseau
B. Montesquien
C. Mirabeau
D. John Locke

Answer 1

Hint:Two Treatises of Government, a central declaration of the political philosophy of the English philosopher was written in 1689. The author has argued that men are by essence free and equal against arguments that God has necessarily made all humans subject to the rule of the king.

Complete answer:
John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau both realised the natural goodness of humans and thus in a more open minded, democratic political system. Both intellectuals proposed regimes that operated for people instead of dynasties or autocrats.
Montesquien stated that the prime aim of government is to preserve good governance, democratic liberty and property of the citizen. He rejected the monarchy of his home country and preferred the english system as an appropriate governance model.
Mirabeau was a popular orator. He was the leader of a moderate stance among revolutionaries by favouring a parliamentary monarchy based on the British model.
John Locke was spoken out for freedom of expression, voice and belief and argued that land was the most essential natural right. He claimed that owners can do whatever they want with their land as long as they do not infringe the rights of others. Locke said that the government was mostly required to support the public that ensures protection and to facilitate the trade. He also asked to Rule gently. The Two Treatises of Government is a work in political history recorded by John Locke, who was an English philosopher in 1689. In his first treatise, he attacked the monarch's absolute authority over his subjects, and in his second treatise, he offered the concept of a civilized country based on the principle of natural rights and social contract. This was popular work of John locke.

Hence Option D is the correct answer.

Note:The views presented in the treatises emerged in the midst of England's political thriller surrounding Charles II. John Locke was intended to offer a compelling criticism of England's present form of democracy and pave the basis for a new alternative.