Question

Who is appointed as an ad hoc judge of the Supreme Court?
A) A retired Judge of the Supreme Court.
B) An acting Judge of the Supreme Court
C) A sitting Judge of High Court duly qualified for appointment as a Supreme Court Judge
D) A person fully qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court

Answer 1

Hint:
ICJ stands for The International Court of Justice is one of the six head organs of the United Nations. It settles questions between states as per global law and offers warning thoughts on worldwide lawful issues.

Complete answer:
The ICJ is the main global court that arbitrates general questions between nations, with its decisions and feelings filling in as essential wellsprings of worldwide law.
Article 127 of the Constitution of India accommodates the arrangement of an ad hoc(temporary) judge in the high court by the Chief Justice of India if there is a need majority (least number) of the Permanent adjudicators in the Supreme court. The High Court judge who ought to be equipped for the arrangement as an adjudicator of the Supreme Court can be named by the Chief Justice of India after the conference with the Chief Justice of the concerned High court and past assent of the President.
Article 31 of the rule sets out a system whereby ad hoc judges sit on quarrelsome cases under the watchful eye of the court. The framework permits any gathering to a quarrelsome case (on the off chance that it, in any case, doesn't have one of that gathering's nationals sitting on the court) to choose one extra individual to sit as an adjudicator on that case in particular. It is accordingly conceivable that upwards of seventeen appointed authorities may sit on one case. The framework may appear to be abnormal when contrasted and homegrown court measures, however, its motivation is to urge states to submit cases.

Thus, option (C) is correct.

Note:
For instance, if a state realizes that it will have a legal official who can take an interest in consideration and offer different adjudicators nearby information and comprehension of the state's point of view, it could be additionally ready to submit to the purview of the court. Despite the fact that this framework doesn't agree with the legal idea of the body, it is normally of minimal functional outcome.