Write down, if possible, the largest natural number.
Answer
637.8k+ views
Hint: We will first understand the set of Natural Numbers and which elements does it consist of. After that, we will assume that it has some largest element and then prove by contradiction that it is
not possible.
Complete step-by-step answer:
We know that the set of Natural Numbers is given by {1, 2, 3, 4, ……………….. }.
We can clearly observe that 1 < 2 < 3 < 4 < ……….
\[\therefore \] 1 is the least element.
But, we need the greatest of Natural Numbers.
Let us assume that it has a largest number which is say a.
Now, since a is the largest among all the Natural Numbers.
\[\therefore n < a,\forall n \in \mathbb{N}\] ……………..(1)
Now, we know that the successor of a natural number is also a natural number.
\[\therefore \] a + 1 is also a natural number.
So, by using (1), we will get:
$ \Rightarrow a + 1 < a$
This implies that:
$ \Rightarrow 1 < 0$, which is absolutely absurd.
Therefore, our assumption is wrong.
Hence, the set of Natural numbers do not have any largest number.
Note: The students must note that “This property of Natural Numbers that it does not have any maximum is known as the “Archimedean Property” which is going to be extremely handy to you in future. Archimedean property states that “the set of Natural Numbers are unbounded above”. But the students must also note that the set of Natural Numbers have the “Well Ordering Property” which states that it always has a least element. Like in natural numbers 1 is the least element.
The students must note that we used the fact: successor of natural numbers is also a natural number. But we could also have used the fact that “The set of Natural Numbers are closed under addition”.
not possible.
Complete step-by-step answer:
We know that the set of Natural Numbers is given by {1, 2, 3, 4, ……………….. }.
We can clearly observe that 1 < 2 < 3 < 4 < ……….
\[\therefore \] 1 is the least element.
But, we need the greatest of Natural Numbers.
Let us assume that it has a largest number which is say a.
Now, since a is the largest among all the Natural Numbers.
\[\therefore n < a,\forall n \in \mathbb{N}\] ……………..(1)
Now, we know that the successor of a natural number is also a natural number.
\[\therefore \] a + 1 is also a natural number.
So, by using (1), we will get:
$ \Rightarrow a + 1 < a$
This implies that:
$ \Rightarrow 1 < 0$, which is absolutely absurd.
Therefore, our assumption is wrong.
Hence, the set of Natural numbers do not have any largest number.
Note: The students must note that “This property of Natural Numbers that it does not have any maximum is known as the “Archimedean Property” which is going to be extremely handy to you in future. Archimedean property states that “the set of Natural Numbers are unbounded above”. But the students must also note that the set of Natural Numbers have the “Well Ordering Property” which states that it always has a least element. Like in natural numbers 1 is the least element.
The students must note that we used the fact: successor of natural numbers is also a natural number. But we could also have used the fact that “The set of Natural Numbers are closed under addition”.
Recently Updated Pages
Master Class 12 Economics: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Physics: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Biology: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
List of coprime numbers from 1 to 100 class 7 maths CBSE

Full Form of IASDMIPSIFSIRSPOLICE class 7 social science CBSE

Differentiate between weather and climate How do they class 7 social science CBSE

Write a letter to the editor of the national daily class 7 english CBSE

How do you write 50000000 in scientific form class 7 maths CBSE

How many sides does a circle have a 10 sides b 20 sides class 8 maths CBSE


