
The following relation is defined on the set of real numbers: aRb if \[a-b>0\]. Find whether the relation is reflexive, symmetric or transitive.
Answer
607.2k+ views
Hint: We will use the definitions of reflexive, symmetric and transitive relations to solve this question. A relation is a reflexive relation If every element of set A maps to itself. A relation in a set A is a symmetric relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\], for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}}\in A\]. A relation in a set A is a transitive relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] and \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{3}})\in R\] for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},{{a}_{3}}\in A\].
Complete step-by-step answer:
Before proceeding with the question we should know about the concept of relations and different types of relations that are reflexive, symmetric and transitive relations.
A relation in set A is a subset of \[A\times A\]. Thus, \[A\times A\] is two extreme relations.
A relation in a set A is a reflexive relation if \[(a,a)\in R\], for every \[a\in A\].
A relation in a set A is a symmetric relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\], for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}}\in A\].
A relation in a set A is a transitive relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] and \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{3}})\in R\] for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},{{a}_{3}}\in A\].
A relation in a set A is an equivalence relation if R is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
We will first check reflexivity. Now let a be an arbitrary element of R. Then,
\[\begin{align}
& \Rightarrow a-b>0 \\
& \Rightarrow a-a=0 \\
\end{align}\]
Now we know that 0 is not greater than 0. So the given relation is not reflexive.
Now moving on to symmetry. Let \[(a,b)\in R\].
\[\begin{align}
& \Rightarrow a-b>0 \\
& \Rightarrow b-a<0 \\
\end{align}\]
This implies that \[(b,a)\notin R\]. Hence the given relation is not symmetric.
Finally, we will check for transitivity. Let \[(a,b)\in R\] and \[(b,c)\in R\].
\[\Rightarrow a-b>0.....(1)\] and \[\Rightarrow b-c>0.......(2)\]
Adding equation (1) and equation (2) we get,
\[\begin{align}
& \Rightarrow a-b+b-c>0 \\
& \Rightarrow a-c>0 \\
\end{align}\]
This implies that \[(a,c)\in R\] and hence the given relation is transitive.
So the given relation is not reflexive and not symmetric but it is transitive.
Note: Remembering the definition of relations and the types of relations is the key here. We in a hurry can make a mistake in thinking it as a symmetric set but we have to check the definition by taking subsets of the given set A and then putting it in the relation.
Complete step-by-step answer:
Before proceeding with the question we should know about the concept of relations and different types of relations that are reflexive, symmetric and transitive relations.
A relation in set A is a subset of \[A\times A\]. Thus, \[A\times A\] is two extreme relations.
A relation in a set A is a reflexive relation if \[(a,a)\in R\], for every \[a\in A\].
A relation in a set A is a symmetric relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\], for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}}\in A\].
A relation in a set A is a transitive relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] and \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{3}})\in R\] for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},{{a}_{3}}\in A\].
A relation in a set A is an equivalence relation if R is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
We will first check reflexivity. Now let a be an arbitrary element of R. Then,
\[\begin{align}
& \Rightarrow a-b>0 \\
& \Rightarrow a-a=0 \\
\end{align}\]
Now we know that 0 is not greater than 0. So the given relation is not reflexive.
Now moving on to symmetry. Let \[(a,b)\in R\].
\[\begin{align}
& \Rightarrow a-b>0 \\
& \Rightarrow b-a<0 \\
\end{align}\]
This implies that \[(b,a)\notin R\]. Hence the given relation is not symmetric.
Finally, we will check for transitivity. Let \[(a,b)\in R\] and \[(b,c)\in R\].
\[\Rightarrow a-b>0.....(1)\] and \[\Rightarrow b-c>0.......(2)\]
Adding equation (1) and equation (2) we get,
\[\begin{align}
& \Rightarrow a-b+b-c>0 \\
& \Rightarrow a-c>0 \\
\end{align}\]
This implies that \[(a,c)\in R\] and hence the given relation is transitive.
So the given relation is not reflexive and not symmetric but it is transitive.
Note: Remembering the definition of relations and the types of relations is the key here. We in a hurry can make a mistake in thinking it as a symmetric set but we have to check the definition by taking subsets of the given set A and then putting it in the relation.
Recently Updated Pages
Master Class 10 Computer Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 General Knowledge: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
What is the median of the first 10 natural numbers class 10 maths CBSE

Which women's tennis player has 24 Grand Slam singles titles?

Who is the Brand Ambassador of Incredible India?

Why is there a time difference of about 5 hours between class 10 social science CBSE

Write a letter to the principal requesting him to grant class 10 english CBSE

A moving boat is observed from the top of a 150 m high class 10 maths CBSE

