Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store
seo-qna
SearchIcon
banner

Systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and reducing the risks of disaster is called _________.
A. Biodiversity conservation
B. Environmental protection
C. Disaster Risk Reduction
D. Globalisation

Answer
VerifiedVerified
565.5k+ views
Hint: It intends to lessen financial weaknesses to calamity just as managing the ecological and different risks that trigger them. Here it has been firmly affected by the mass of exploration on a weakness that has shown up on paper since the mid-1970s just as the planning of catastrophic event hazards.

Complete Step by Step Answer:
A systematic approach to identifying assessing and reducing the risks of disaster is called Disaster Risk Reduction. Disaster risk reduction is the obligation of advancement and alleviation offices the same. It should be essential almost such associations accomplish their work, not an extra or coincidental activity. Fiasco hazard decrease is wide-running: Its degree is a lot more extensive and more profound than ordinary crisis executives. There is potential for fiasco hazard decrease activities in pretty much every area of advancement and helpful work. Catastrophe hazard is a marker of the helpless turn of events, so diminishing calamity hazard requires coordinating DRR strategy and DRM practice into the maintainable advancement objectives. We need to oversee hazards, not simply debacles.
The most generally referred to the meaning of Disaster hazard decrease is one utilized by UN offices, for example, the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), otherwise called the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, and the United Nations Development Program (UNDP): "The theoretical system of components considered with the potential outcomes to limit weaknesses and fiasco chances all through the general public, to evade (counteraction) or to restrict (moderation and readiness) the unfavorable effects of perils, inside the expansive setting of a practical turn of events.

Thus, option (C) is correct.

Note: It is a deliberate way to deal with recognizing, surveying, and diminishing the dangers of a fiasco. It expects to diminish financial weaknesses to catastrophe just as managing the ecological and different risks that trigger them. DRR is exceptionally wide-running. Its degree is a lot more extensive and more profound than customary crises.

WhatsApp Banner