
Rewrite the following sentence correctly. Do not make unnecessary changes.
The opposition-held to ridicule the reforms suggested by the ruling party.
Answer
614.1k+ views
Hint: A sentence has a subject which is followed by a verb and then an object. The subject and the object are connected by one verb in a sentence.
Complete step-by-step answer:
From the hint given to us, we know that a sentence has a subject which is followed by a verb and then an object. We also know that the subject and the object are connected by one verb in a sentence.
We observe that in the sentence given to us the opposite is the subject and the ruling party is the object. However, we also observe that there are two verbs in the sentence, that is ‘held’ which is past for ‘hold’ and ‘ridicule’. From the two verbs used, we have to choose one in order to correct the sentence.
If we construct the sentence as, “The opposition-held to ridicule the reforms suggested by the ruling party.”, the sentence is meaningless as the verb does not fit in the context of the sentence.
Hence, we can construct the sentence as “The opposition ridiculed the reforms suggested by the ruling party.” the sentence is correct grammatically and is meaningful too. We chose the simple past form of ‘ridicule’ as the original sentence had used a simple past for hold.
Note: Two verbs can only be used to connect the subject with the object if the verbs are separated by commas.
Complete step-by-step answer:
From the hint given to us, we know that a sentence has a subject which is followed by a verb and then an object. We also know that the subject and the object are connected by one verb in a sentence.
We observe that in the sentence given to us the opposite is the subject and the ruling party is the object. However, we also observe that there are two verbs in the sentence, that is ‘held’ which is past for ‘hold’ and ‘ridicule’. From the two verbs used, we have to choose one in order to correct the sentence.
If we construct the sentence as, “The opposition-held to ridicule the reforms suggested by the ruling party.”, the sentence is meaningless as the verb does not fit in the context of the sentence.
Hence, we can construct the sentence as “The opposition ridiculed the reforms suggested by the ruling party.” the sentence is correct grammatically and is meaningful too. We chose the simple past form of ‘ridicule’ as the original sentence had used a simple past for hold.
Note: Two verbs can only be used to connect the subject with the object if the verbs are separated by commas.
Recently Updated Pages
Basicity of sulphurous acid and sulphuric acid are

Master Class 10 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Computer Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Class 10 Question and Answer - Your Ultimate Solutions Guide

Master Class 10 General Knowledge: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
Which country won the ICC Men's ODI World Cup in 2023?

In cricket, how many legal balls are there in a standard over?

Explain the Treaty of Vienna of 1815 class 10 social science CBSE

A boat goes 24 km upstream and 28 km downstream in class 10 maths CBSE

What does "powerplay" mean in limited-overs cricket?

What is the "Powerplay" in T20 cricket?

