
Prove that the sum of product of any row or column with corresponding co-factors of some other row or column in a matrix is zero.
Answer
586.5k+ views
Hint: To prove this, definition and knowledge of minors and cofactors is required. The minor of an element is the determinant of the matrix formed by deleting the row and column of that element. If the element is $a_{ij}$, then the cofactor of that element by-
$A_{ij}=(-1)^{i+j} M_{ij}$, where $M_{ij}$ is the minor.
Complete step by step answer:
Let X be the a 3x3 square matrix such that-
$X=\begin{bmatrix}a_{11}&a_{12}&a_{13}\\a_{21}&a_{22}&a_{23}\\a_{31}&a_{32}&a_{33}\end{bmatrix}$
We have to prove that the sum of product of any row or column with corresponding co-factors of some other row or column in a matrix is zero, so we will find cofactors of the second row and multiply with the first row. By definition, we can write that-
$M_{21}=det\begin{bmatrix}a_{12}&a_{13}\\a_{32}&a_{33}\end{bmatrix}=a_{12}a_{33}-a_{13}a_{32}\\M_{22}=det\begin{bmatrix}a_{11}&a_{13}\\a_{31}&a_{33}\end{bmatrix}=a_{11}a_{33}-a_{13}a_{31}\\M_{23}=det\begin{bmatrix}a_{11}&a_{12}\\a_{31}&a_{32}\end{bmatrix}=a_{11}a_{32}-a_{12}a_{31}$
The cofactors for the corresponding minors will be-
$A_{21}=\left(-1\right)^{i+j}M_{21}\\=\left(-1\right)^{2+1}\left(a_{12}a_{33}-a_{13}a_{32}\right)\\=-\left(a_{12}a_{33}-a_{13}a_{32}\right)\\A_{22}=\left(-1\right)^{i+j}M_{22}\\=\left(-1\right)^{2+2}\left(a_{11}a_{33}-a_{13}a_{31}\right)\\=\left(a_{11}a_{33}-a_{13}a_{31}\right)\\A_{23}=\left(-1\right)^{i+j}M_{23}\\=\left(-1\right)^{2+3}\left(a_{11}a_{32}-a_{12}a_{31}\right)\\=-\left(a_{11}a_{32}-a_{12}a_{31}\right)$
We have to find the sum of product of the elements and corresponding cofactors which is-
$\begin{align}
&{a_{11}}{A_{21}} + {a_{12}}{A_{22}} + {a_{13}}{A_{23}} \\
&= {a_{11}}\left( { - \left( {{a_{12}}{a_{33}} - {a_{13}}{a_{32}}} \right)} \right) + {a_{12}}\left( {{a_{11}}{a_{33}} - {a_{13}}{a_{31}}} \right) + {a_{13}}\left( { - \left( {{a_{11}}{a_{32}} - {a_{12}}{a_{31}}} \right)} \right) \\
&= - {a_{11}}{a_{12}}{a_{33}} + {a_{11}}{a_{13}}{a_{32}} + {a_{12}}{a_{11}}{a_{33}} - {a_{12}}{a_{13}}{a_{31}} - {a_{13}}{a_{11}}{a_{32}} + {a_{13}}{a_{12}}{a_{31}} \\
&All\;the\;terms\;cancel\;each\;other, \\
&= 0 \\
\end{align} $
Hence, proved.
Note: To prove this statement, we can choose any other row or column or any other square matrix. The final result will be the same. Also, one should take care of the sign of the cofactor which has been calculated.
$A_{ij}=(-1)^{i+j} M_{ij}$, where $M_{ij}$ is the minor.
Complete step by step answer:
Let X be the a 3x3 square matrix such that-
$X=\begin{bmatrix}a_{11}&a_{12}&a_{13}\\a_{21}&a_{22}&a_{23}\\a_{31}&a_{32}&a_{33}\end{bmatrix}$
We have to prove that the sum of product of any row or column with corresponding co-factors of some other row or column in a matrix is zero, so we will find cofactors of the second row and multiply with the first row. By definition, we can write that-
$M_{21}=det\begin{bmatrix}a_{12}&a_{13}\\a_{32}&a_{33}\end{bmatrix}=a_{12}a_{33}-a_{13}a_{32}\\M_{22}=det\begin{bmatrix}a_{11}&a_{13}\\a_{31}&a_{33}\end{bmatrix}=a_{11}a_{33}-a_{13}a_{31}\\M_{23}=det\begin{bmatrix}a_{11}&a_{12}\\a_{31}&a_{32}\end{bmatrix}=a_{11}a_{32}-a_{12}a_{31}$
The cofactors for the corresponding minors will be-
$A_{21}=\left(-1\right)^{i+j}M_{21}\\=\left(-1\right)^{2+1}\left(a_{12}a_{33}-a_{13}a_{32}\right)\\=-\left(a_{12}a_{33}-a_{13}a_{32}\right)\\A_{22}=\left(-1\right)^{i+j}M_{22}\\=\left(-1\right)^{2+2}\left(a_{11}a_{33}-a_{13}a_{31}\right)\\=\left(a_{11}a_{33}-a_{13}a_{31}\right)\\A_{23}=\left(-1\right)^{i+j}M_{23}\\=\left(-1\right)^{2+3}\left(a_{11}a_{32}-a_{12}a_{31}\right)\\=-\left(a_{11}a_{32}-a_{12}a_{31}\right)$
We have to find the sum of product of the elements and corresponding cofactors which is-
$\begin{align}
&{a_{11}}{A_{21}} + {a_{12}}{A_{22}} + {a_{13}}{A_{23}} \\
&= {a_{11}}\left( { - \left( {{a_{12}}{a_{33}} - {a_{13}}{a_{32}}} \right)} \right) + {a_{12}}\left( {{a_{11}}{a_{33}} - {a_{13}}{a_{31}}} \right) + {a_{13}}\left( { - \left( {{a_{11}}{a_{32}} - {a_{12}}{a_{31}}} \right)} \right) \\
&= - {a_{11}}{a_{12}}{a_{33}} + {a_{11}}{a_{13}}{a_{32}} + {a_{12}}{a_{11}}{a_{33}} - {a_{12}}{a_{13}}{a_{31}} - {a_{13}}{a_{11}}{a_{32}} + {a_{13}}{a_{12}}{a_{31}} \\
&All\;the\;terms\;cancel\;each\;other, \\
&= 0 \\
\end{align} $
Hence, proved.
Note: To prove this statement, we can choose any other row or column or any other square matrix. The final result will be the same. Also, one should take care of the sign of the cofactor which has been calculated.
Recently Updated Pages
Master Class 12 Economics: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Biology: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Physics: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 8 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Class 8 Question and Answer - Your Ultimate Solutions Guide

Trending doubts
Why is there a time difference of about 5 hours between class 10 social science CBSE

Write a letter to the principal requesting him to grant class 10 english CBSE

What is the median of the first 10 natural numbers class 10 maths CBSE

The Equation xxx + 2 is Satisfied when x is Equal to Class 10 Maths

Which of the following does not have a fundamental class 10 physics CBSE

State and prove converse of BPT Basic Proportionality class 10 maths CBSE

