Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store
seo-qna
SearchIcon
banner

Prove that the greatest integer function defined by f(x)=[x],0<x<3 is not differentiable at x = 1 and x = 2.

Answer
VerifiedVerified
552k+ views
like imagedislike image
Hint: To show that the functions are not differentiable at the given points we need to prove that they not continuous at the given points using the condition limxxf(x)=limxx+f(x)

Complete step-by-step answer:
We know that a function is differentiable only if it is continuous .
So it is enough if we prove that the function is not continuous at x = 1 and x = 2
For a function to be continuous the left hand derivative must be equal to the right hand derivative
That is , limxxf(x)=limxx+f(x)
So let's check the continuity at x = 1
limx1f(x)=limx1[0]=0
limx1+f(x)=limx1+[1]=1
Hence we can see that limxxf(x)limxx+f(x)
Hence it is not continuous at x = 1
Hence it is not differentiable at x = 2
So let's check the continuity at x = 2
limx2f(x)=limx2[1]=1
limx2+f(x)=limx2+[2]=2
Hence we can see that limxxf(x)limxx+f(x)
Hence it is not continuous at x = 2
Hence it is not differentiable at x = 2
Therefore it is proved that the function is not differentiable at x = 1 and x = 2.

Note: Continuity of a function is the characteristic of a function by virtue of which, the graphical form of that function is a continuous wave. A differentiable function is a function whose derivative exists at each point in its domain.
Every differentiable function is continuous but that doesn’t mean all the continuous functions are differentiable