Who had proposed amendments in the PDPP Act, 1984?
A.Justice K.J Thomas Committee
B.Justice K.T Thomas Committee
C.David Thomson Committee
D.None of these
Answer
609k+ views
Hint: The Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act was enacted in 1984 that provides for legal punishment of anyone who destroys public property in cases of rioting, vandalism and arson. The provisions of the Act include up to five years in jail and a fine for any individual who has committed an act of mischief in respect of any public property. Even with guidelines of the Supreme Court, the implementation of the Act has not been efficient because the identification of protesters is difficult and even if an individual is identified, legal evidence is lacking in most cases.
Complete Step by Step answer: Let’s look at the options one by one :
Option A: is incorrect.
Option B: is correct. The Thomas Committee was constituted in 2007 under former Supreme Court judge K.T Thomas to make recommendations for amendments in the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act of 1984. The suggested recommendations of the Thomas Committee were to reverse the burden of proof against protesters and that the prosecution should be able to prove that public property had been damaged in direct action called by an organisation and the accused also participated in such direct action.
Options C and D: are incorrect.
Hence, The correct answer is Option B.
Note: Another committee that suggested recommendations to the Act was the Nariman Committee under senior advocate Fali Nariman. This committee recommended for extracting compensation for the damages caused to public property. The Supreme Court agreed to this recommendation and ordered the High Courts to direct Suo Motu action for an investigation into the damages.
Complete Step by Step answer: Let’s look at the options one by one :
Option A: is incorrect.
Option B: is correct. The Thomas Committee was constituted in 2007 under former Supreme Court judge K.T Thomas to make recommendations for amendments in the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act of 1984. The suggested recommendations of the Thomas Committee were to reverse the burden of proof against protesters and that the prosecution should be able to prove that public property had been damaged in direct action called by an organisation and the accused also participated in such direct action.
Options C and D: are incorrect.
Hence, The correct answer is Option B.
Note: Another committee that suggested recommendations to the Act was the Nariman Committee under senior advocate Fali Nariman. This committee recommended for extracting compensation for the damages caused to public property. The Supreme Court agreed to this recommendation and ordered the High Courts to direct Suo Motu action for an investigation into the damages.
Recently Updated Pages
Master Class 11 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Biology: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Physics: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Chemistry: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
One Metric ton is equal to kg A 10000 B 1000 C 100 class 11 physics CBSE

What is cell theory Who formulated it class 11 biology CBSE

Phyllotaxy is the arrangement of ALeaflets BLeaves class 11 biology CBSE

Difference Between Prokaryotic Cells and Eukaryotic Cells

The symbiotic association of fungi and algae is called class 11 biology CBSE

Cell theory was formulated by A Schleiden and Schwann class 11 biology CBSE

