Question

Judicial review in India does not extend to _____________.
(A) the advice that the Council of Ministers gives to the President
(B) the discretionary powers of the Governors
(C) the privileges enjoyed by Parliament members
(D) any of the above

Answer 1

Hint: Judicial review in India may invalidate laws, acts and governmental actions which violates the basic elements of our constitution. For instance, an executive decision may be invalidated for being unlawful or a statute may be invalidated for violating the terms of a constitution

So the correct answer is an option (D): Any of the above. Judicial review in India does not extend to any of the above options.

Complete Answer: Judicial review in India does not extend to any of the above mentioned scopes.
Judicial review is the power of the courts to rule on the constitutionality of legislative and executive acts of the government that fall under their usual jurisdiction. When the legislative, executive and judicial branches have damaged constitutional values ​​and denied the Indian people the rights established by the Indian Constitution, judicial oversight plays a very important role in protecting human rights. The Supreme Court has the power to review the constitutionality of the laws enacted by the legislature and the measures taken by the administrative authority. It may declare such acts or laws to be unconstitutional if they find it so. The advice given by the Council of Ministers to the President does not fall under judicial review. It’s powers do not extend to the powers held by the Governors while acting in sole discretion or the privileges that the members of Parliament enjoy.

Note: The doctrine of judicial review varies between jurisdictions, so the procedure and scope of judicial review may differ between countries. In India, a judicial review is a review of government decisions made by the Supreme Court of India