
In Euclid's Division Lemma, when a = bq + r where a, b are positive integers then what values r can take?
Answer
600k+ views
Hint – In order to solve this problem you need to know Euclid's Division Lemma. Here we need to know that r should be less that q because if r is more than q the dividend a is not fully divided.
Complete step by step answer:
Euclid’s Division Lemma:
It tells us about the divisibility of integers. It states that any positive integer ‘a’ can be divided by any other positive integer ‘ b’ in such a way that it leaves a remainder ‘r’.
Euclid's division Lemma states that for any two positive integers ‘a’ and ‘b’ there exist two unique whole numbers ‘q’ and ‘r’ such that, a = bq + r, where 0≤r
Here, a= Dividend, b= Divisor, q= quotient and r = Remainder.
Hence, the values 'r’ can take 0≤r
Note – For example when the number 17 is divided by 3 it can be written as 17 = 3(5)+2. Here the 17 is fully divided therefore we can see 2 (remainder) is less than 5 (quotient).
Euclid's Division Lemma is only valid for the set of whole numbers and not for negative integers, fractions, irrational numbers and composite numbers. This is probably because the basic set of numbers that we deal with are whole numbers and Euclid worked only on them for the same purpose.
Complete step by step answer:
Euclid’s Division Lemma:
It tells us about the divisibility of integers. It states that any positive integer ‘a’ can be divided by any other positive integer ‘ b’ in such a way that it leaves a remainder ‘r’.
Euclid's division Lemma states that for any two positive integers ‘a’ and ‘b’ there exist two unique whole numbers ‘q’ and ‘r’ such that, a = bq + r, where 0≤r
Here, a= Dividend, b= Divisor, q= quotient and r = Remainder.
Hence, the values 'r’ can take 0≤r
Note – For example when the number 17 is divided by 3 it can be written as 17 = 3(5)+2. Here the 17 is fully divided therefore we can see 2 (remainder) is less than 5 (quotient).
Euclid's Division Lemma is only valid for the set of whole numbers and not for negative integers, fractions, irrational numbers and composite numbers. This is probably because the basic set of numbers that we deal with are whole numbers and Euclid worked only on them for the same purpose.
Recently Updated Pages
Two men on either side of the cliff 90m height observe class 10 maths CBSE

What happens to glucose which enters nephron along class 10 biology CBSE

Cutting of the Chinese melon means A The business and class 10 social science CBSE

Write a dialogue with at least ten utterances between class 10 english CBSE

Show an aquatic food chain using the following organisms class 10 biology CBSE

A circle is inscribed in an equilateral triangle and class 10 maths CBSE

Trending doubts
Why is there a time difference of about 5 hours between class 10 social science CBSE

Write a letter to the principal requesting him to grant class 10 english CBSE

What is the median of the first 10 natural numbers class 10 maths CBSE

The Equation xxx + 2 is Satisfied when x is Equal to Class 10 Maths

Which of the following does not have a fundamental class 10 physics CBSE

State and prove converse of BPT Basic Proportionality class 10 maths CBSE

