
Find the ratio in which the point \[\left( -3,k \right)\] divides the line segment joining the points \[\left( -5,-4 \right)\] and \[\left( -2,3 \right)\]. Also find the value of k.
Answer
599.4k+ views
Hint: In this question, we first need to assume the ratio in which the given point divides the line segment formed by the other two points as \[m:1\]. Now, using the section formula given by \[\left( \dfrac{m{{x}_{2}}+n{{x}_{1}}}{m+n},\dfrac{m{{y}_{2}}+n{{y}_{1}}}{m+n} \right)\] on equating the x coordinate on both the sides we get the ratio. Then on substituting the values obtained in the y coordinate and equating we get the value of k.
Complete step-by-step solution -
SECTION FORMULA:
The coordinate of the point which divides the joint of \[\left( {{x}_{1}},{{y}_{1}} \right)\] and \[\left( {{x}_{2}},{{y}_{2}} \right)\] in the ratio \[m:n\] internally is
\[\left( \dfrac{m{{x}_{2}}+n{{x}_{1}}}{m+n},\dfrac{m{{y}_{2}}+n{{y}_{1}}}{m+n} \right)\]
Now, given in the question that \[\left( -3,k \right)\] divides the joint of \[\left( -5,-4 \right)\] and \[\left( -2,3 \right)\]
Now, on comparing the above points with the section formula we get,
\[{{x}_{1}}=-5,{{x}_{2}}=-2,{{y}_{1}}=-4,{{y}_{2}}=3\]
Now, let us assume that the point \[\left( -3,k \right)\] divides the line segment in the ratio \[m:1\]
Now, from the section formula we have,
\[\Rightarrow \left( -3,k \right)=\left( \dfrac{m{{x}_{2}}+n{{x}_{1}}}{m+n},\dfrac{m{{y}_{2}}+n{{y}_{1}}}{m+n} \right)\]
Let us now substitute the respective values of the coordinates and the ratio in the above formula and simplify further
\[\Rightarrow \left( -3,k \right)=\left( \dfrac{m\left( -2 \right)-5}{m+1},\dfrac{m\left( 3 \right)-4}{m+1} \right)\]
Now, this can be further written in the simplified form as
\[\Rightarrow \left( -3,k \right)=\left( \dfrac{-2m-5}{m+1},\dfrac{3m-4}{m+1} \right)\]
Let us now equate the x coordinates in both the points of the above equation
\[\Rightarrow -3=\dfrac{-2m-5}{m+1}\]
Now, on cross multiplication on both the sides we get,
\[\Rightarrow -3\left( m+1 \right)=-2m-5\]
Now, on multiplying the respective terms and simplifying further we get,
\[\Rightarrow -3m-3=-2m-5\]
Let us now rearrange the terms on both the sides
\[\Rightarrow 3m-2m=5-3\]
Now, on further simplification we get,
\[\therefore m=2\]
Thus, the point divides the line segment in the ratio \[2:1\]
Now, let us substitute the value of m in the section formula and equate the y coordinates
\[\Rightarrow k=\dfrac{3m-4}{m+1}\]
Now, on substituting the value of m in the above equation we get,
\[\Rightarrow k=\dfrac{3\left( 2 \right)-4}{2+1}\]
Now, this can be further written as
\[\Rightarrow k=\dfrac{6-4}{3}\]
Now, on further simplification we get,
\[\therefore k=\dfrac{2}{3}\]
Hence, the point \[\left( -3,\dfrac{2}{3} \right)\] divides the line segment in the ratio \[2:1\]
Note: Instead of assuming the ratio in which the point divides the line segment as \[m:1\] we can also solve it by assuming the ratio as \[m:n\] and simplify further which gives the value of \[\dfrac{m}{n}\] so that we get the values of m and n. Here, the value of m and n will be the same in both the methods. It is important to note that we considered the ratio as \[m:1\] instead of \[m:n\] because when we substitute we have three unknowns m, n and k but only two equations. So, we take \[m:1\] because even if there is a value for n then we will get it in the fraction of m. So, to avoid assumptions we can directly consider \[m:1\].
Complete step-by-step solution -
SECTION FORMULA:
The coordinate of the point which divides the joint of \[\left( {{x}_{1}},{{y}_{1}} \right)\] and \[\left( {{x}_{2}},{{y}_{2}} \right)\] in the ratio \[m:n\] internally is
\[\left( \dfrac{m{{x}_{2}}+n{{x}_{1}}}{m+n},\dfrac{m{{y}_{2}}+n{{y}_{1}}}{m+n} \right)\]
Now, given in the question that \[\left( -3,k \right)\] divides the joint of \[\left( -5,-4 \right)\] and \[\left( -2,3 \right)\]
Now, on comparing the above points with the section formula we get,
\[{{x}_{1}}=-5,{{x}_{2}}=-2,{{y}_{1}}=-4,{{y}_{2}}=3\]
Now, let us assume that the point \[\left( -3,k \right)\] divides the line segment in the ratio \[m:1\]
Now, from the section formula we have,
\[\Rightarrow \left( -3,k \right)=\left( \dfrac{m{{x}_{2}}+n{{x}_{1}}}{m+n},\dfrac{m{{y}_{2}}+n{{y}_{1}}}{m+n} \right)\]
Let us now substitute the respective values of the coordinates and the ratio in the above formula and simplify further
\[\Rightarrow \left( -3,k \right)=\left( \dfrac{m\left( -2 \right)-5}{m+1},\dfrac{m\left( 3 \right)-4}{m+1} \right)\]
Now, this can be further written in the simplified form as
\[\Rightarrow \left( -3,k \right)=\left( \dfrac{-2m-5}{m+1},\dfrac{3m-4}{m+1} \right)\]
Let us now equate the x coordinates in both the points of the above equation
\[\Rightarrow -3=\dfrac{-2m-5}{m+1}\]
Now, on cross multiplication on both the sides we get,
\[\Rightarrow -3\left( m+1 \right)=-2m-5\]
Now, on multiplying the respective terms and simplifying further we get,
\[\Rightarrow -3m-3=-2m-5\]
Let us now rearrange the terms on both the sides
\[\Rightarrow 3m-2m=5-3\]
Now, on further simplification we get,
\[\therefore m=2\]
Thus, the point divides the line segment in the ratio \[2:1\]
Now, let us substitute the value of m in the section formula and equate the y coordinates
\[\Rightarrow k=\dfrac{3m-4}{m+1}\]
Now, on substituting the value of m in the above equation we get,
\[\Rightarrow k=\dfrac{3\left( 2 \right)-4}{2+1}\]
Now, this can be further written as
\[\Rightarrow k=\dfrac{6-4}{3}\]
Now, on further simplification we get,
\[\therefore k=\dfrac{2}{3}\]
Hence, the point \[\left( -3,\dfrac{2}{3} \right)\] divides the line segment in the ratio \[2:1\]
Note: Instead of assuming the ratio in which the point divides the line segment as \[m:1\] we can also solve it by assuming the ratio as \[m:n\] and simplify further which gives the value of \[\dfrac{m}{n}\] so that we get the values of m and n. Here, the value of m and n will be the same in both the methods. It is important to note that we considered the ratio as \[m:1\] instead of \[m:n\] because when we substitute we have three unknowns m, n and k but only two equations. So, we take \[m:1\] because even if there is a value for n then we will get it in the fraction of m. So, to avoid assumptions we can directly consider \[m:1\].
Recently Updated Pages
Master Class 10 Computer Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 General Knowledge: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
What is the median of the first 10 natural numbers class 10 maths CBSE

Which women's tennis player has 24 Grand Slam singles titles?

Who is the Brand Ambassador of Incredible India?

Why is there a time difference of about 5 hours between class 10 social science CBSE

Write a letter to the principal requesting him to grant class 10 english CBSE

State and prove converse of BPT Basic Proportionality class 10 maths CBSE

