Check whether the relation R defined in the set {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) as \[R=\{(a,b):b=a+1\}\] is reflexive, symmetric or transitive.
Answer
662.4k+ views
Hint: We will use the definitions of reflexive, symmetric and transitive relations to solve this question. A relation is a reflexive relation If every element of set A maps to itself. A relation in a set A is a symmetric relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\], for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}}\in A\]. A relation in a set A is a transitive relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] and \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{3}})\in R\] for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},{{a}_{3}}\in A\].
Complete step by step answer:
Before proceeding with the question we should know about the concept of relations and different types of relations that are reflexive, symmetric and transitive relations.
A relation in set A is a subset of \[A\times A\]. Thus, \[A\times A\] is two extreme relations.
A relation in a set A is a reflexive relation if \[(a,a)\in R\], for every \[a\in A\].
A relation in a set A is a symmetric relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\], for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}}\in A\].
A relation in a set A is a transitive relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] and \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{3}})\in R\] for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},{{a}_{3}}\in A\].
A relation in a set A is an equivalence relation if R is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
It is mentioned in the question that the relation R defined on the set A is {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) as \[R=\{(a,b):b=a+1\}\]. So according to the above definition the relation is not reflexive as a is not equal to a+1 for any \[a\in A\].
Also \[3=2+1\] but \[2\ne 3+1\] that is \[(2,3)\in R\] but \[(3,2)\notin R\], so the relation is not symmetric.
Now \[(2,3)\in R\] and also \[(3,4)\in R\] but \[(2,4)\notin R\] since \[3=2+1\], \[4=3+1\] but \[4\ne 2+1\]. Hence the relation is not transitive also.
Hence \[R=\{(a,b):b=a+1\}\] is not reflexive, not symmetric and neither transitive.
Note: We in a hurry can make a mistake in thinking it as a transitive set and as a reflexive set but we have to check the definition by taking subsets of the given set A. A relation is a reflexive relation If every element of set A maps to itself. A relation in a set A is a transitive relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] and \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{3}})\in R\] for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},{{a}_{3}}\in A\].
Complete step by step answer:
Before proceeding with the question we should know about the concept of relations and different types of relations that are reflexive, symmetric and transitive relations.
A relation in set A is a subset of \[A\times A\]. Thus, \[A\times A\] is two extreme relations.
A relation in a set A is a reflexive relation if \[(a,a)\in R\], for every \[a\in A\].
A relation in a set A is a symmetric relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\], for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}}\in A\].
A relation in a set A is a transitive relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] and \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{3}})\in R\] for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},{{a}_{3}}\in A\].
A relation in a set A is an equivalence relation if R is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
It is mentioned in the question that the relation R defined on the set A is {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) as \[R=\{(a,b):b=a+1\}\]. So according to the above definition the relation is not reflexive as a is not equal to a+1 for any \[a\in A\].
Also \[3=2+1\] but \[2\ne 3+1\] that is \[(2,3)\in R\] but \[(3,2)\notin R\], so the relation is not symmetric.
Now \[(2,3)\in R\] and also \[(3,4)\in R\] but \[(2,4)\notin R\] since \[3=2+1\], \[4=3+1\] but \[4\ne 2+1\]. Hence the relation is not transitive also.
Hence \[R=\{(a,b):b=a+1\}\] is not reflexive, not symmetric and neither transitive.
Note: We in a hurry can make a mistake in thinking it as a transitive set and as a reflexive set but we have to check the definition by taking subsets of the given set A. A relation is a reflexive relation If every element of set A maps to itself. A relation in a set A is a transitive relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] and \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{3}})\in R\] for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},{{a}_{3}}\in A\].
Recently Updated Pages
Differentiate between voluntary action and reflex class 10 biology CBSE

The uses of bleaching powder are A It is used bleaching class 10 chemistry CBSE

Fill in the blanks with abstract nouns of the words class 10 english CBSE

How many threedigit numbers are there class 10 maths CBSE

What is a reflex arc class 10 biology CBSE

Construct a square whose diagonal is 6cm Measure the class 10 maths CBSE

Trending doubts
Explain the Treaty of Vienna of 1815 class 10 social science CBSE

The slogan Jai Hind was given by A Lal Bahadur Shastri class 10 social science CBSE

10 examples of evaporation in daily life with explanations

What is the full form of POSCO class 10 social science CBSE

Identify the feminine form of noun nephew a shenephew class 10 english CBSE

Make a sketch of the human nerve cell What function class 10 biology CBSE

