Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store
seo-qna
SearchIcon
banner

Who among the following introduced the Permanent Settlement of Bengal in 1793?
A.Lord Cornwallis
B. Lord Ripon
C. Robert Clive
D. John Adam

Answer
VerifiedVerified
544.2k+ views
Hint: 1)There is a tomb in his name in Ghazipur as a memorial.
2)He introduced the Act of Union when he had served in the Ireland military.
3)He was known as the First Marques.

Complete answer:
Let us assess the options and discuss the solution.
Option A. The Permanent Settlement of Bengal was presented by Lord Cornwallis in 1793. Lord Cornwallis came to India as the Governor-General. The Permanent Settlement was perhaps the most renowned of Lord Cornwallis. It concurred that the landowners would have unending and innate rights over the land, insofar as they pay the fixed income to the British Government. It is the correct option.

Option B. Lord Ripon is known to have allowed the Indians first taste of opportunity by presenting the Local Self Government in 1882. His plan of neighborhood self-government built up the Municipal establishments which had been experiencing childhood in the nation since the time India was involved by the British Crown. It is an incorrect option.

Option C. The Doctrine of Subsidiary Alliance was presented by Lord Wellesley. Under the auxiliary union framework, the leader of the unifying Indian State was constrained to acknowledge the perpetual positioning of a British power inside his domain and to pay an appropriation for its support. It is an incorrect option.

Option D. John Adams served as Governor-General of India and CJI of the Supreme Court. He did not introduce any policies. It is an incorrect option.

Hence, the correct answer is option (A)

Note: The essential negative mark of this framework was that the proficiency relied on the idea of the Zamindars. On the off chance that they were acceptable, the interests of the farmers and the land were cared for quite well.

They would make upgrades in the land which would be useful to everybody concerned. In any case, if the landowners were awful, they were careless of the situation of the ranchers and the states of the land.