Question

According to the Mimamsa School of Philosophy, liberation is possible through___________.
A) Yoga
B) Bhakti
C) Karma
D) Jana

Answer 1

Hint:
Mimamsa is one of the six traditional Hindu darśanas. It is among the most punctual schools of Hindu philosophies. It has pulled in generally less insightful investigation, despite the fact that its hypotheses and especially its inquiries on interpretation and philosophy have been profoundly powerful on all traditional Indian philosophies. Its examination of language has been of focal significance to the lawful writing of India.

Complete Answer:
Old Mimamsa's focal concern was epistemology (pramana), that is what is the solid way to information. It discussed not just "how monitors actually learn or know, whatever he knows", yet in addition whether the idea of all information is characteristically roundabout, regardless of whether those, for example, foundationalists who evaluate the legitimacy of any "defended convictions" and information framework make imperfect assumptions of the very premises they investigate, and how to effectively decipher and keep away from mistakenly deciphering dharma messages, for example, the Vedas. It posed inquiries, for example, "what is devata (god)?", "are customs committed to devatas viable?", "what makes anything adequate?", and "would it be able to be demonstrated that the Vedas, or any accepted content in any arrangement of thought, questionable or faultless (svatah pramanya, naturally legitimate)?, assuming this is the case, how?" and others. To Mimamsa researchers, the idea of non-exact information and human intentions to it are with the end goal that one can never exhibit sureness, one can just distort information claims, in some cases. According to Francis Clooney, a teacher at Harvard Divinity School practicing on Hinduism, the Mimamsa school is "one of the most unmistakably Hindu types of reasoning; it is without genuine equal somewhere else in the world".

The focal content of the Mimamsa school is Jamini's Mimamsa Sutras, alongside the verifiably powerful discourses on this sutra by Sabara and by Kumarila Bhatta. Together, these writings create and apply the standards of language investigation, (for example, the principles of inconsistency), stating that one must look at injunctive suggestions in any sacred text, yet additionally analyze the substitute related or converse recommendations for better arrangement. They recommended that to arrive at right and substantial information it isn't simply adequate to request evidence of a recommendation, it is critical to give confirmation of a suggestion's negative just as announce and demonstrate one's own favored recommendations. Further, they attested that at whatever point observation isn't the methods for direct confirmation and information, one can't demonstrate such non-experimental recommendations to be "valid or false", rather one can just demonstrate a non-exact suggestion is "bogus, not bogus, or uncertain". According to the Mimamsa system of philosophy, liberation is possible by means of Karma. It was started by Jaimini.

So the correct answer is C.

Note:
For instance, Mimamsa welcome not just the interest for evidence of an injunctive recommendation, for example, "agnihotra ceremonial leads one to paradise", yet propose that one must look at and demonstrate substitute suggestions, for example, "ceremonial doesn't lead one to paradise", "something different leads one to paradise", "there is paradise", "there is no paradise, etc.